Showing posts with label 1982. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1982. Show all posts

26/02/2014

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)

Film: Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Release: 1982, theatrical
Starring: William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Ricardo Montalban
Directed by: Nicholas Meyer
Previous in the series: Star Trek: The Motion Picture
Next in the series: Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
IMDB page: Link opens in a new window
Description: While undergoing an inspection of the Star Ship Enterprise, the aging Admiral James T. Kirk is called to an emergency situation concerning a scientific project simply known as "Genesis". However an old and very capable foe is lurking in the shadows.

Hans' thoughts:

Critics log, Star date -308846.50745180104. Subject is the second installment in the Star Trek cinematic franchise. After a lukewarm reception of the original movie, the creators seemingly decided to appeal more to the already sizable fanbase of the original series as opposed to make a more main stream picture like the predecessor. Ironically, this movie would prove to the most critically acclaimed of them all and a great jumping on point for newcomers to the franchise. Set roughly in the distant future of the 2200's, Star Trek features the continued exploits of the crew of the S. S. Enterprise, in the main series on a mission to explore uncharted territories in outer space. In this movie however, James T. Kirk now promoted to the status of Admiral has long since left the captains chair and is celebrating his birthday in somber mood. To lighten up his spirits he decides to make an inspection round of his former ship when he is thrown into a dangerous venture concerning powerful revolutionary science and the revenge scheme of Khan, a genetically modified super soldier created in the 1990's. 

If that all sounded a bit complicated to you, have no fear. The film does a remarkable job of bringing everyone up to speed and while some of the terminology might be mostly understood by fans of the original series, the film features classical concepts of aging, revenge and obsession. In the role of Khan we have Ricardo Montalban. He plays a very quiet well-spoken man who only few times feels the need to raise his voice at all. You can just feel the seething hatred he harbors for the main character every time he encounters him. But somehow there's also a great deal of mutual respect between him and William Shatner as Kirk. There's a lot of parallels to classic literature in the film, particularly that of Moby Dick by Herman Melville. Khan shares the obsessive vengeful nature of Captain Ahab throughout the film, to the point of almost letting his emotions get the best of him at times. He's a man that has lost everything and is blind to compromise. The delivery of his lines are just so intense and the nature of them lies closely to almost Shakespearian.

On the other hand we have the cocky William Shatner as James Kirk. While he is more gloomy in this picture than normally he certainly hasn't lost his flair for wit and fast thinking in pressed situations. Kirk has seemingly taught himself to grow up and acknowledge that he won't stay young and spry forever, but his journey in this movie is more about coming to terms with it. While Khan seems to lose everything around him, Kirk is through the looking glass and reliving old thrills from his time as the captain. By his side as always he has Mr. Spock played by Leonard Nimoy and Doctor McCoy played by DeForest Kelley. Actually most of the classic cast of the series has reprised their roles and it's like they never left in the first place. They're all spouting off science fiction terminology like a second nature while keeping their characters well-known features intact. This is despite that the last season of Star Trek the original series was aired in 1969 and this movie came out in 1982. That's over 20 years of absence from a role.

Visually the film is gorgeous, it features new redesigned Star fleet uniforms which more closely resembles that of an army, with the rank of characters shown by stripes and stars rather than the color of their shirt. These costumes feel like they could be worn by an actual fleet rather than the more casual look of the uniforms from the original series. On top of that, we also have some really nice looking sets, simplistic at times but since most of the movie takes place on the bridge of a spaceship it makes sense in context. When the characters do depart to ground level operations, we have some fairly imaginative settings. The most visually appealing part of the movie however, is the exterior shots. For its time the effects are pretty goof, these are some of the best VistaVision model shots of space ships I have seen this side of the original Star Wars movies. Damage to the ships were all hand animated and even though it's outer space there's some great looking colorful shots in there. This, combined with the new original score by James Horner absolutely goosebump-inducing. While Star Wars is certainly the more approachable franchise movie-wise, a lot can be said for the sheer amount of skill in the execution of this film and it's highly recommended for anyone who loves the genre.

17/09/2013

Tron (1982)

Film: Tron
Release: 1982, theatrical
Starring: Jeff Bridges, Bruce Boxleitner, David Warner
Directed by: Steven Lisberger
Next in the series: Tron: Legacy
IMDB page: Link opens in a new window
Description: Having lost the rights to his own creations, the programming prodigy Flynn breaks into the major corporation where he used to work in order to hack the company mainframe and prove his claim - What he finds is more amazing than he would've ever believed possible.

Hans' thoughts:

The year is 1982, the computer as we know it has yet to exist. In spite of the success of the Apple II, Personal computers wouldn't be a normal occurrence in everyday households till the mid 1990's. Cyberspace was considered a new frontier, possible to go wherever we might choose and most people knew about purely through the popularity of arcade games. Along comes Tron, a small out of place science fiction movie produced by a (at the time) stagnating Disney corporation and directed by a complete no-name whose biggest success till then had been an animated special to accompany the TV-broadcast of the 1980 winter olympics. 

Tron is nothing if at least not interesting, in it the creators have managed to predict a lot of things about cyberspace and computers that wouldn't become fact for years to come. Every computer in the world has access to each other, akin to the internet you're using right now and at one point the main character plays on something that looks distinctly like what the game boy would eventually be revealed to look like. It also predicted the dualism of people with their online use, every human actor portraying their counterpart in the cyberspace world Flynn enters. 

The cyberspace world also has a lot of spiritual elements, the "users" (humans) are revered as gods by the programs they control and getting in contact with their user is portrayed in the movie as a deep religious experience. The unit used for contact with the real world looking like a giant temple and the program controlling it looks like an otherworldly priest or sage. The world of cyberspace is done mostly as glowing circuits or grids on black backgrounds, giving the movie a very unique look. The suits civilian programs are wearing look almost like they're wearing togas, otherwise being completely white with their circuits visible in some color. The societies structure, almost like ancient rome during the reformation to christianity in it's use of gladiator battles and religious persecution.

The movie is laden with otherworldly (if a bit poorly dated) imagery and accurate predictions of the very future we now live in. I suspect the cult-status and low success of this movie is merely because it was so ahead of it's time, being a tale of wariness towards a technology that, at best, speculative at the time. If you like movies like The Matrix, this is very like it. With the ongoing boom of technology we live in, the story is perhaps as relevant today as it ever would've been in the past and it is recommended for modern viewers for both this reason and the sheer entertainment value of the piece.

05/06/2013

First Blood (1982)

Film: First Blood
Release: 1982, theatrical
Starring: Richard Crenna, Sylvester Stallone, Brian Dennehy
Directed by: Ted Kotcheff
Next in the series: Rambo: First Blood Part II
IMDB page: Link opens in a new window
Description: A Vietnam war veteran comes to a small town, but is quickly arrested for loitering by the local authorities. His arrest tricker his Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and it quickly becomes a one-man battle against the world


Hans' thoughts:

This movie really has some pretty imagery to go for it, which is the first thing you'll notice when you watch it. Big scenic pictures of nature. Stallone also does a very good job, albeit he speaks a little low so I'm wondering how the movie felt to the theatrical audience in America back in the day. Then again, this might have been a problem with my television but I'm mentioning it anyway. Hurray for subtitles. Honestly I feel that Stallone was a better actor back in the day when he did this one and the first Rocky. The feel of the movie is also very quiet, a lot quieter than what you normally associate with a Rambo movie these days. The death count is also barely there (I counted 1). Looking back today with the knowledge that First Blood would spawn one of the most violent action movie franchises out there, it is almost surreal. This movie also gets it's message across clear and to the point, but without getting too preachy and shoving it in our faces. I feel they made the other sides make their own points, as invalid as they may seem.

Project Wonderful 3